science why-do-all-the-planets-orbit-in-the-same-plane science

Why Do All The Planets Orbit In The Same Plane?

The possibilities were almost limitless, so why does everything line up?

Our Solar System is an orderly place, with the four inner planets, the asteroid belt, and the gas giant worlds all orbiting in the same plane around the Sun. Even as you go farther out, the Kuiper belt objects appear to line up with that same exact plane. Given that the Sun is spherical and that there are stars appearing with planets orbiting in every direction imaginable, it seems too much of a coincidence to be random chance that all these worlds line up. science universe space science planet science space in universe

In fact, practically every Solar System we’ve observed outside of our own appears to have their worlds line up in the same plane, too, wherever we’ve been able to detect it. Here’s the science behind what’s going on, to the best of our knowledge. science universe space science planet science space in universescience universe space science planet science space in universe

science universe space science planet science space in universe

The eight planets of the Solar System orbit the Sun in almost an identical plane, known as the Invariable Plane. This is typical of solar systems as we know them so far. (Joseph Boyle of Quora) science universe space science planet science space in universe

Today, we’ve mapped out the orbits of the planets to incredible precision, and what we find is that they go around the Sun — all of them — in the same two-dimensional plane, to within an accuracy of, at most, 7° difference. science universe space science planet science space in universe

science universe space science planet science space in universe

In fact, if you take Mercury out of the equation, the innermost and most inclined planet, you’ll find that everything else is really well-aligned: the deviation from the Solar System’s invariable plane, or the average plane-of-orbit of the planets, is only about two degrees. science universe space science planet science space in universe

science universe space science planet science space in universe

If you take Mercury out of the equation, the innermost, most-inclined planet, you find that all the worlds of the Solar System are perfectly aligned to within two degrees, a remarkable precision for nature to achieve.(Wikimedia commons author Lookang, based on the work of Todd K. Timberlake and Francisco Esquembre (L); screenshot from Wikipedia (R)) science universe space science planet science space in universe

They’re also pretty closely lined up with the Sun’s rotation axis: just as the planets all spin as they orbit the Sun, the Sun itself spins. And as you might expect, the axis that the Sun rotates about is — again — within approximately 7° of all the planets’ orbits. science universe space science planet science space in universe

And yet, this isn’t what you would have imagined unless something caused these planets to all be sandwiched down into the same plane. You would’ve expected the orbits to be oriented randomly, since gravity — the force that keeps the planets in these steady orbits — works the same in all three dimensions. You would’ve expected something more like a swarm than a nice, orderly set of nearly perfect circles. The thing is, if you go far enough away from our Sun — beyond the planets and asteroids, beyond the Halley-like comets and even beyond the Kuiper Belt — that’s exactly what you find.

While the Oort cloud is hypothesized to exist in an enormous, sphere-like swarm, the Kuiper belt itself is still mostly plane-like, aligning with the invariable plane that the planets orbit in. (NASA and William Crochot)

So what is it, exactly, that caused our planets to wind up in a single disk? In a single plane orbiting our Sun, rather than as a swarm? To understand this, let’s travel back in time to when our Sun was first forming: from a molecular cloud of gas, the very thing that gives rise to all new stars in the Universe.

A large molecular cloud, many of which are clearly visible in the Milky Way and other local group galaxies, will often fragment, contract, and give birth to new, massive stars as time goes on. (Yuri Beletsky (Las Campanas Observatory, Carnegie Institution for Science) (L); J. Alves, M. Lombardi and C. J. Lada, A&A, 462 1 (2007) L17-L21 (R))

When a molecular cloud grows to be massive enough, gravitationally bound and cool enough to contract-and-collapse under its own gravity, like the Pipe Nebula (above, left), it will form dense enough regions where new star clusters will be born (circles, above right).

You’ll notice, immediately, that this nebula — and any nebula like it — is not a perfect sphere, but rather takes on an irregular, elongated shape. Gravitation is unforgiving of imperfections, and because of the fact that gravity is an accelerative force that quadruples every time you halve the distance to a massive object, it takes even small differences in an initial shape and magnifies them tremendously in short order.

This visible-light image composite of the Orion Nebula was created by the Hubble Space Telescope team back in 2004–2006. (NASA, ESA, M. Robberto (Space Telescope Science Institute/ESA) and the Hubble Space Telescope Orion Treasury Project Team)

The result is that you get a star-forming nebula that’s incredibly asymmetric in shape, where the stars form in the regions where the gas gets densest. The thing is, when we look inside, at the individual stars that are in there, they’re pretty much perfect spheres, just like our Sun is.

Inside the Orion Nebula, in visible light (L) and infrared light (R), a star-forming nebula houses a massive star cluster inside, evidence that these nebulae are giving birth to new solar systems in an active fashion. (NASA; K.L. Luhman (Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Mass.); and G. Schneider, E. Young, G. Rieke, A. Cotera, H. Chen, M. Rieke, R. Thompson (Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz.); NASA, C.R. O’Dell and S.K. Wong (Rice University))

But just as the nebula itself became very asymmetric, the individual stars that formed inside came from imperfect, overdense, asymmetric clumps inside that nebula. They’re going to collapse in one (of the three) dimensions first, and since matter — stuff like you and me, atoms, made of nuclei and electrons — sticks together and interacts when you smack it into other matter, you’re going to wind up with an elongated disk, in general, of matter. Yes, gravitation will pull most of that matter in towards the center, which is where the star(s) will form, but around it you’ll get what’s known as a protoplanetary disk. Thanks to the Hubble Space Telescope, we’ve seen these disks directly!

These protoplanetary disks in the Orion Nebula, some ~1300 light years away, will someday grow up to be solar systems not very different from our own. (Mark McCughrean (Max-Planck–Inst. Astron.); C. Robert O’Dell (Rice Univ.); NASA)

That’s your first hint that you’re going to wind up with something that’s more aligned in a plane than a randomly swarming sphere. To go to the next step, we have to turn to simulations, since we haven’t been around long enough to watch this process unfold — it takes about a million years — in any young solar system. But here’s the story that the simulations tell us.

According to simulations, asymmetric clumps of matter contract all the way down in one dimension first, where they then start to spin. That “plane” is where the planets form, and many intermediate stages have been directly observed by observatories like Hubble. (STScl OPO — C Burrows and J. Krist (STScl), K. Stabelfeldt (JPL) and NASA)

The protoplanetary disk, after going “splat” in one dimension, will continue to contract down as more and more matter gets attracted to the center. But while much of the material gets funnelled inside, a substantial amount of it will wind up in a stable, spinning orbit in this disk.


There’s a physical quantity that has to be conserved: angular momentum, which tells us how much the entire system — gas, dust, star and all — is intrinsically spinning. Because of how angular momentum works overall, and how its shared pretty evenly between the different particles inside, this means that everything in the disk needs to move, roughly, in the same (clockwise or counterclockwise) direction overall. Over time, that disk reaches a stable size and thickness, and then small gravitational instabilities begin to grow those instabilities into planets.

Sure, there are small, subtle differences (and gravitational effects occurring between interacting planets) between different parts of the disk, as well as slight differences in initial conditions. The star that forms at the center isn’t a single point, but rather an extended object somewhere in the ballpark of a million kilometers in diameter. And when you put all of this together, itwill lead to everything not winding up in a perfectly singular plane, but it’s going to be extremely close. In fact, we’ve only recently — as in just three years ago — discovered the very first planetary system beyond our own that we’ve caught in the process of forming new planets in a single plane.

Prev1 of 2Next

4 thoughts on “Why Do All The Planets Orbit In The Same Plane?

  1. “Expansion of the Universe”
    It’s with-in the most harmonious agreement that we’re all attempting to understand the Universe or its perplexities of mystery, and reward. While the cosmos has evolved from a creativity of beauty, and mysterious time. A Universe that has expanded from the beginning of wonder, and the etherness of its own mysterious unknown. As the cosmos mysteriously reincarnates in the challenges of its own perplexity, and the affinities of an ever-changing beyond. The perplexity of ethereal mysteries or its etherness of an infinite beauty that stems from the affinities of infinitesimal mysteries or other material beyonds. As the expansion of an uneven beginning that attempts to cast doubt upon the wonder of its own creation and infinitesimal rewards. .

  2. So, this simply tells us that the phenomenon exists and doesn’t explain anything, doesn’t answer the question in the title of the article? Why?

    1. Ugh, figured out why, it’s a darn slideshow.

      I hate the “click next” format and hope it dies a quick death…

  3. It’s like the article cut off halfway through.

    I’m going to have to guess the answer is because of gravitational forces connected to the rotation of the star?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *